Loved and Damned: The Fear of “Chromo-civilization”

In 19th-cen­tury Amer­ica, gar­dens became the ulti­mate status sym­bol. Fruit trees, vari­et­ies of veget­ables, and exot­ic flowers moved into private house­holds. For a long time, how­ever, seed and plant mer­chants were unable to present their wares in a par­tic­u­larly seduct­ive way. But sud­denly, the world turned col­or­ful. Very col­or­ful!

Pflanzenkatalog von Ellwanger & Barry's, 1802
Plant Cata­log by Ell­wanger & Barry, 1802

Until the mid-19th cen­tury, seed cata­logs were merely unat­tract­ive lists. The few illus­tra­tions — litho­graphs, engrav­ings, or wood­cuts — were prin­ted in black and white. Col­or­ing them by hand would have been far too time-con­sum­ing and thus too expens­ive.

It was not until the second half of the 19th cen­tury that high-qual­ity, inex­pens­ive mech­an­ic­al col­or print­ing in large edi­tions became pos­sible. In 1837, the Franco-Ger­man litho­graph­er Gode­froy Engel­mann pat­en­ted chro­mo­li­tho­graphy. Although tech­nic­ally com­plex, it soon allowed for the mass pro­duc­tion of vibrant post­cards, cigar boxes, posters, and cal­en­dars. And finally: plant cata­logs.

Chromolithos: A Threat to Culture?

These “chro­mo­li­thos” now washed over Amer­ica like a gar­ish, mul­ti­colored wave. And they sparked fears and anxi­et­ies. Edwin L. Godkin, edit­or of the weekly magazine The Nation and one of the most prom­in­ent Amer­ic­an cul­tur­al crit­ics of the 19th cen­tury, argued in 1874 against the idea that col­or prints could ever rise to the level of “fine arts.” Godkin believed that chro­mo­li­tho­graphy was symp­to­mat­ic of a gen­er­al decline in the val­ues of mod­ern Amer­ic­an cul­ture. He feared that these cheap, col­or­ful prints were cre­at­ing a pseudo-cul­ture.

His con­cern: people sur­round them­selves with the appear­ance of art and know­ledge without under­stand­ing the depth behind it. For Godkin, chro­mo­li­tho­graphy was the “fast food” of edu­ca­tion — attract­ive, but without nutri­tion­al value.

The subtle and del­ic­ate col­or applied by an artist’s hand was, for the journ­al­ist, some­thing entirely dif­fer­ent from the intense col­or mass-pro­duced by machines. Godkin warned of the decline of cul­tur­al val­ues through this “Chromo-civil­iz­a­tion.”

“Subtle and del­ic­ate” are cer­tainly not the words for the col­ors on the cov­ers of these mass-pro­duced plant cata­logs; they rather testi­fy to a naive joy in the new pos­sib­il­it­ies of col­or print­ing. They were the pion­eers of a new advert­ising psy­cho­logy. With their lumin­ous hues, they prom­ised a splendor that nature in a home garden could nev­er truly deliv­er. It was the begin­ning of the mod­ern con­sumer world, where the image mat­ters more than the real­ity.

How­ever, I find that these cata­log titles have a very unique aes­thet­ic of their own, which I would­n’t want to keep from you.

Text: Ger­hard Groebe | Images: Pub­lic domain

Chro­mo­li­thos pub­lished around 1900: